Most Active Stories
- Suspects In Mugging Death Of UNC Chapel Hill Professor Charged With Murder
- Carl Kasell Helps With Surprise Marriage Proposal
- Sixth-Grader's Science Project Catches Ecologists' Attention
- A Portrait Photographer Defies Social Norms
- Why Teacher Pay Matters Even If You Are Not a Teacher [Interactive Map]
Hosts, Reporters and Producers
Wed December 11, 2013
N.C. Lawmaker Thinks Budget Comprise Is Too Small To Signal Change In Washington
Rep. David Price (D-NC) plans to vote for the budget agreement, proposed on Wednesday by representatives Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Patty Murray (D-WA). Though he's not convinced it will be enough in the long run.
"It's hard to imagine sequestration looming over us for ten years," said Price. "We are going to need to do something bigger and ambitious at some point."
"It does not necessarily mean we're on our way to larger agreements," Price added.
Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle are lukewarm on the agreement. It provides $63 billion in "sequestration relief" (meaning restoring funds that had been cut by sequestration earlier this year) and $85 dollars in increased revenue (meaning additional cuts and raising fees for things like airline security).
Noticeably absent from the agreement was any mention of extending long-term unemployment benefits, something North Carolinians know all too much about.
"North Carolina has gotten an unwelcome foretaste of what it's like to have unemployment benefits cut," said Price, in reference to cuts made at the state level last summer. "We've had tens of thousands of people cut off by virtue of Governor McCrory and our state government. But nationally, we really need to continue the unemployment extension for long-term unemployed people."